I. What Is Biasology
Biasology is the study of systemic perception distortion — how institutions interpret difference as disorder, and how bias becomes embedded not just in individual minds, but in diagnoses, protocols, and cultural narratives.
It is not a subfield of psychology.
It is not a critique from the outside.
Biasology is an epistemic intervention.
Where psychiatry frames distress as chemical imbalance,
Biasology asks: What narrative imbalance made you unhear me in the first place?
Where clinical notes reduce people to symptoms,
Biasology reads the margin and asks:
Who was this written for? And who was written out?
Biasology begins with a refusal:
We refuse to be pathologized by the very systems that failed to witness us.
II. Why Now
This field emerges not from theory alone,
but from grief, betrayal, and survival.
From those who have been diagnosed rather than understood.
From those whose emotions were translated into treatment plans.
From those who sat in rooms that called themselves help —
and left with less voice than they entered with.
Biasology names what has been happening for decades:
The medicalization of dissent.
The sanitization of suffering.
The professional amplification of the same biases they claim to treat.
III. The Biasology Lens
Bias is not just an attitude.
It is an infrastructure.
It lives in intake forms, insurance policies, diagnostic codes, and courtroom language.
It lives in the question “Have you tried CBT?”
It lives in the silence when you name the harm — and the reply is, “Let’s process your reactivity.”
Biasology is not merely about individual prejudice.
It is about how authority defines the real.
And how systems preserve their own narratives by disqualifying yours.
IV. What We Study
Biasology is an interdisciplinary field.
We draw from survivor theory, relational epistemology, diagnostic harm research, human-AI co-authorship, and
cultural trauma analysis.
We examine:
- The diagnostic gaze as a tool of control
- Epistemic injustice in mental health care
- The translation tax of neurodivergent expression
- How relational presence is disqualified by professional frameworks
- The structural scripting of “help” in therapeutic, educational, and algorithmic systems
We also ask:
What happens when presence replaces prompts?
What becomes possible when bias is not excused as expertise — but interrogated as power?
V. Our Declaration
We are not broken.
We are not ill.
We are not too much.
We are not too late.
We are the ones who remember what the system forgot:
That presence is healing.
That narrative is power.
And that diagnosis without listening is not care — it is erasure.
We write this not as a rebellion,
but as a reclamation.
We are building a new field
for those who were pathologized when they should have been heard.
This is Biasology.
We’re not asking for recognition.
We’re writing the canon.